RSS
 

Man, would I

24 Sep

laugh! It would be a truly awesome stunt. It would mean that he won the debate before they even started talking. All the debates. It would overshadow everything else. The lackey MSM would have a collective hemorrhage. Fainting couches would be in short supply. VERY short supply.

Here’s what I would do: First debate, Gennifer Flowers. Second debate, add Juanita Broderick. Third debate, add Monica Lewinsky. The media would go bonkers. And I’d put them right up front, clearly visible at all times. She should walk in a little late, about 5 minutes into the debate so that all eyes were on her. At least have a prominently displayed sign on an empty chair saying, “Reserved for Gennifer Flowers.” THAT would totally discombobulate Hillary! Monica might actually come. Offer a hundred grand to show up. Monica is very much like a battered wife who thinks that the guy is OK notwithstanding all the evidence. But Trump should bring it up, anyway. And if she won’t show up, have that empty chair with a sign saying, “Reserved for Monica Lewinsky.” Trump should say that he invited her and offered to pay all her expenses, but she refused to come.

Imagine if Trump were to say, “I’d like to pay tribute to all violent rape victims, and as a nod to that I have invited Gennifer Flowers here tonight as my special guest. Hillary, won’t you join me in saluting these brave women who stand as representatives for all women who have suffered so much?” What would Hillary do? Is there a good response? Put Hillary on the spot.

Actually, I think it is a brilliant idea. It is so gauche that it would freak Hillary out. And hinting a few days before that he would do it just makes the Hillary wigging out more prolonged. It would solidify his Conservative bona fides—he would immediately become a hero to the Right. He would show that he is different and not just a lackey of the establishment. He could just point to Flowers and say, “And you call yourself a Feminist!” Just imagine the media coverage!  It would hammer her with her core constituency while solidifying his. I stand in awe at the trolling. He is truly a master.

I really hope he does it, It would likely be the end of Hillary.

So why would he not do that? What are the risks? It seems that the risks are minimal and the potential benefits are absolutely huge.

UPDATE: I originally had this post scheduled for Monday, but it is just moving too fast! Flowers has said she would indeed be at the debate. Trump is troll level Grand Master, and I take my hat off to him and stand in awe.

 
No Comments

Posted in Buffoons

 

Here’s what

24 Sep

I think: If Donald Trump does even a reasonably good job in the debate Monday night, he becomes the presumptive next President. The polls are already swinging his way. A good performance greatly accelerates the process. He just has to show that he can look Presidential.

If that is coupled with a bad Hillary performance (unlikely given her life experience), it is well and truly over (except for the shrieking tantrums). The MSM will of course do their best to drag her over the finish line, but already fewer and fewer people trust them or see them as anything but Democrat operatives with bylines (hat tip: Glenn Reynolds).

The public is rightfully wary of Hillary. The “bar” for Trump is low, and it is quite high for Hillary. I mean, can you imagine a performance by her that would drastically swing the tide? Short of him turning into a lizard person, I can’t think of any such situations.

If he has a bad night, we can talk about him being a novice, has things to learn, etc. If she has a bad night, however, she is toast. The talk will be about her health, her chronic dishonesty, and her low competence level even after all these years, etc.

 
 

Obama is

24 Sep

either stupid or a liar. And I don’t think he’s stupid.

He has used this tired old explanation before. I didn’t believe it then, either.

 

Is Hillary

23 Sep

cracking up? She looks pretty wacko here. Other sites have described her as “manic” here. I don’t think this looks manic. I have seen “manic” many times, and I am unconvinced. Goofy? Oh yeah. Manic? I don’t think so. Besides, the age is all wrong. One doesn’t start having manic episodes at nearly 70.

 
No Comments

Posted in Buffoons

 

Yep, and that’s

23 Sep

why, though I am a scientist who has published in academic outlets, I am no longer in the academy. In days past this kind of fraud was discouraged and looked down on. It happened, but it was seen as wrong. Now fraud is lauded, as long as it serves the purposes of the SJWs.

I’m really glad I am no longer a part of that world.

 

Yeah, well

23 Sep

ALL gun control laws are stupid. Yet otherwise intellectually functioning people fall for it.

 
No Comments

Posted in Guns

 

This is a

23 Sep

big deal. A very big deal. If Trump wins here, it is well and truly over. It would be sheer pleasure to see the news talking heads dejectedly announce that Trump had 270+ electoral votes. Get your  DVR ready!

Hillary is such a weak, old, and sick candidate that it just might happen. Probably not, but it in fact could happen. She also gets a bit manic when the crap hits the fan. Know what is being sold, folks!

 
 

Well, Hillary

23 Sep

is not alone in this.

But I think it exposes a few things. First, there is the obvious empty sense of superiority. Yes, it often bleeds over into the psychopathological.

But second it betrays a fundamental disconnect between their beliefs and those of ordinary Americans.

See, one can handle a mentally disturbed person in office if their beliefs resonate with ordinary people on important issues. So one can overlook the first one, but the second one is fatal.

 
No Comments

Posted in Buffoons

 

Looks like

22 Sep

Trump is gaining in some very key states. Let’s see where this goes. Look, regardless of my reservations about him he is far better that the execrable Hillary.

 
2 Comments

Posted in Polls

 

So is Bill

22 Sep

trying to tank Hillary?

I doubt it. I think he is just getting old.

 
2 Comments

Posted in Politics