Archive for the ‘Immorality’ Category

Did I mention

17 Jan

that Hillary Clinton is horribly corrupt? Well, she is.

It would have been totally immoral to either vote for her or facilitate her victory by voting for some 3rd-party loser. I’m just glad I don’t have to cop to that.


I think this is

05 Jan

incontrovertibly true. The Left is not about freedom or human dignity now–it is merely about venting one’s spleen. It is ONLY about irrational Trump hatred. I think the MSM’s utterly pathetic covering of the Iran situation makes this conclusion unavoidable.

See, the modern Left is no longer mainly about freedom or well-being. It is not about policy. It is almost completely about spite and bile. It is about getting in a foaming-at-the-mouth rage because they didn’t get the shiny bauble they wanted and Trump won. It also shows that the people overwhelmingly rejected their Leftist coercion and that is a severe narcissistic insult to them (yes, big cities voted for she-who-shall-not-be-named, but normal people sure didn’t!). It is a personality disorder. It is psychopathology, pure and simple.

So the loony Left have spent time, effort, and money in the hopes of making this all go away. They are in the “bargaining” stage of grief, though anger is still immensely prevalent. It’s actually a combination of “Anger” and “Bargaining.” They would much prefer Felonia von Pantsuit to Trump. They prefer the economic misery of Obama to the economic boom of Trump. The fact that most people are much better off makes no never-mind to them. The Left, in short, have become immoral.

Honestly, I’m not sure how one can be both a modern Leftist and remain moral. You could 30 years ago, but I’m not at all sure that is the case now. In fact, I don’t think it is.

That leads us to the 2018 elections. We need to understand that this is a moral issue. The important thing is for moral people to get out and vote in overwhelming numbers in 2018. It is time for all good people to come to the aid of their country! Run through the tape, not to the tape.

Don’t be immoral. Don’t be a Lefty.

Comments Off on I think this is

Posted in Immorality, Political Philosophy, Psychopathology


So much for “fair.”

13 Dec

So is “justice” in “Justice Department” meant to be ironic?

Look, the entire Mueller investigation is a pile of dung. It is just a witch hunt. It is totally unfair. No one of more than pedestrian IQ can say that it is fair.  And I find that totally immoral.

YOU need to ask just who you are and what you actually value, if you back the Mueller persecutory fishing expedition.

Comments Off on So much for “fair.”

Posted in Immorality, Javert-ism


Well, to my

11 Dec

unprofessional eye, the handwriting of the “note” is the same as what is above it.

Yet we KNOW FOR A FACT that the bottom is a forgery. So what does that say about the upper writing? Uh, MAYBE THE WHOLE THING IS A FORGERY! Well, that would certainly fit well with the “D.A.” annotation on it–that alone tells me that this is almost for sure fake. I mean, even if you were a DA, would you put that on a yearbook signature? But it would fit with a naive teen trying frantically to impress her friends.

It just seems odd to me. Odd, odd, ODD! Odd and rather unbelievable. Is it all a lie?

I’m not saying that I know for sure that the whole thing is or is not a forgery (almost no-one can say that), I’m saying that there is something not at all right, here. It looks like a total forgery. I think that it is entirely likely that the whole thing is indeed a forgery–part of it for sure is.

Nelson and her attorney have been dishonest–that is totally indisputable. That is certain. This, even though she and her attorney repeatedly gave the bald-faced lie that NONE of it was a forgery. But does the dishonesty go far beyond just putting a self-serving “note” on an inscription? How on earth do you know that they are telling the truth now but they were lying then? I mean, come on! REALLY?

So yes, when cornered like a rabid rat she admits to partial forgery. Hmmm…

In any case, I think it is frankly immoral to aid and abet Doug Jones. And these red flags make it even more so.

My prediction: Moore +10.

Comments Off on Well, to my

Posted in Dishonesty, Fraud, Immorality


Aaaaaand another one

08 Dec


Do I need to mention that this is yet another Democrat? Sheesh, what’s with these guys?

Oh yeah, force and coercion are the fundamental footings for ALL Leftism. I am moral, therefore I am not a Leftist. OK, that clears it up.

Comments Off on Aaaaaand another one

Posted in Immorality, Political Philosophy


Gee, what a surprise.

05 Dec

If you are stupid, that is. The rest of us are not surprised at all. Not one bit.

I have long told you that this is a bogus and corrupt process! It is nothing but a witch hunt. I really don’t give a rat’s patoot WHAT Mueller says in terms of truth-value. Yes, there may be practical ramifications, but certainly no moral ones.

Mueller is morally bankrupt. People (like Flynn) pled guilty because after a million bucks spent on his defense, he just can’t spend much more. Look, Mueller has unlimited money. He has no risk, no “skin in the game.” His victims are not so lucky. So yes, there is a conviction, but we need to understand that this in no way implicates bad behavior. YOU would plead guilty if faced with financial ruin and the pauperization of your loved ones.

You think that this is all on the up-and-up? Don’t be a fricken’ moron!

I think Mueller has a MAJOR credibility problem.



22 Nov

Just WOW!

This is truly revolting.

Comments Off on Wow!

Posted in Immorality



03 Nov

is an immoral turd blossom. Plain and simple. She is a dirtbag.

Look, Bernie was both a terrible and he got unfairly hosed over. Yes, Trump would have beaten him senseless–it would have been a Reagan-Mondale debacle for the Democrats. But he won. It was suck-ups like Brazile who were happy to do the evil queen’s bidding…

I think we (correctly) note that the GOP at times shoots itself in the foot, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Yep, that is true. But in this case, the Democrat voters were totally stupid and wanted Bernie. They wanted Bernie! Well, give it to them. Good and hard.

Comments Off on Brazile

Posted in Immorality


You mean

31 Oct

that journalists like Maggie Haberman are not honest? What are you going to tell me next, that water is wet or the sky is blue? What revelations! It is all just so unbelievable.

Don’t be a blamed fool. Please.

I think there is a general loss of confidence, and that is because certain people have been manifestly dishonest. These include (but are not limited to):

  • Mueller is manifestly scummy and unreliable
  • The media are manifestly scummy and unreliable
  • Democrats in general are manifestly scummy and unreliable
  • RINOs are manifestly scummy and unreliable

I don’t thing any of those point are not very obvious–they all are both categorically true and almost universally accepted as fact. No wonder Trump won.

Regular people are sick to death of this crap.

Comments Off on You mean

Posted in Corruption, Immorality, Media Untrustworthiness



23 Oct

Will justice be served? Not if Democrats can help it. They certainly don’t want that!

2018 should be a bloodbath for Democrats. If I were advising any Republican candidate I would advise that they focus on immorality and corruption by the Democrats. I would tie the Democrat in the race very tightly to this corruption and immorality. And it would NOT be hard.

Even if they themselves are not shown to be corrupt, I would make a big stink about how, being a Democrat, they would support those who are corrupt and immoral, and that in and of itself is immoral. In fact, voting for them at all is morally questionable! I think this is an opportunity to hammer the crap out of Democrats, mainly because they are indeed immoral and it is indeed immoral to empower them.

The Democrats will take the Bill Clinton defense: ALL public servants are immoral–they are ALL imperfect, and the only issue is what kind of policies the (admittedly imperfect) person will implement. In other words, there is a moral equivalence there. They say, “Yes, he is an SOB. But he is my SOB. And besides, they are all SOBs (a truly mindless argument), but I am just willing to admit it and you are not (and therefore I am morally better than you).” You really have not seen this much yet, but mark my words–you will. Oh, you will.

But Democrat voters, what does this say about you and your morals? How do you justify voting for a scumbag? Can you just say, “Yeah, but I like what this particular scumbag does?” Do you argue that all politicians are scumbags (which, BTW, eviscerates all arguments against Donald Trump)? If all Presidents are scumbags, then the only issues are in policy. It really does lay bare the core of our identities, while at the same time destroying any logical opposition to Trump.

NOW is the time to make this moral case. It’s not that you are demanding any human candidate to be perfect. No. but you are demanding that arguments (and people) be logically and internally consistent. You have to weigh the good against the bad. In other words, there is judgment required. So defend your judgment.

See, a person might say that yes, Hillary is an immoral dirtbag but they still like her policies better. She has been weighed in the balance and the person feels that the good outweighs the bad. I think that is a far more honest approach. NOW we can argue about the policies, “the issues.” We can argue about the weighing and the morality itself. Fine. Let’s argue. That is healthy.

But see, that puts my actual choice (and morality) at risk. If I can just shut you up I don’t have to address these rather uncomfortable issues. The core issues can therefore stay submerged and unexamined.

Comments Off on Wow.

Posted in Corruption, Immorality