article. And the blogfather notes the problem:
But have you noticed? While all this head-spinning legal jibber-jabber goes back and forth, the foundation of the false narrative we’ve been hearing since November 8 has vanished. Now that we’re supposed to believe there was no real investigation of Trump and his campaign, what else can we conclude but that there was no real evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia . . . which makes sense, since Russia did not actually hack the election, so the purported objective of the collusion never existed.
There either was good evidence given to the media or there was not. Either Obama was illegally leaking to smear a political foe or he wasn’t. So which is it? Follow me, here.
If Obama was not illegally and unethically gouging Trump, then how did the media get that information slamming him? Did opponents and the media and Democrats (though I repeat myself) just make it all up? Where did they get information? But then again, if all the lamestream media and Democrats said was just a damnable and made up lie, why on earth should anyone believe them now? They have admitted to just making crap up. Under the bus they go! Say “Hi” to all the others there…
But then if what they said was true (as far as they knew) and Obama was leaking like a sieve and they had illegal access to confidential information and details of Presidential persecution, doesn’t that prove that Obama himself is a criminal? Or at the very least a liar?
They are caught between the Scylla and Charybdis.
When you lie down with pigs, you inevitably get some mud on yourself… Now the MSM has to say where they stand, if they hew to any logical consistency whatsoever. Then again, logic has never been a strong point for these folks, eh?
If what they said is just made-up nonsense, then no sentient being gives a crap about what they say now. If what they say is true, their boyfriend Obama is a criminal. See, the MSM depends on the stupidity and illogic and apathy of the public to not get that (gee, sounds like Obamacare–this is a pattern for these guys).
I mean, Comey said that there was just no evidence of any connection between the Russians and the Trump campaign and then he said that there was no investigation. That is likely true–there was never any reason for an investigation.
But then just how could one know that unless an investigation had been done? I mean, you can’t say both that there was no Russian interference and that you didn’t do an investigation! If you know that there was no interference, you obviously did an investigation! DUH!
What they say is just not internally consistent. Methinks they are liars…