the Democrats have long been the party of racism! They are trying the same old “NAZIs were on the right” ruse again in order to fool the rubes. Don’t be snookered again…
Archive for the ‘Hypocrisy’ Category
I would love to see this. Seems only fair. I think that what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander!
I’m sick to death of the hypocrisy.
like a total nut. He has railed against firearms and firearm manufacturers. So let’s ask him, do his bodyguards carry firearms? Uhm, someone had to manufacture them.
Sorry, this is disgusting. He needs to shut his pie-hole. He may be an expert on Catholicism, but one would be a great fool to listen to him on other subjects.
When the left takes ownership of the actions of Pol Pot and Joseph Stalin we can talk…
that the spendthrift Rubio buys a luxury yacht while poor people like John Kerry struggle and struggle!
engaging in misongynistic rape fantasies is totally OK. If you are on the Right, it is proof positive that you are a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal.
on a podcast very recently, and a couple things struck me:
1) She was entirely reasonable. Yes, there was a little bombast, but nothing extreme or offensive. She actually criticized the host and his former boss. The host was pretty good-natured about it and seemed totally unoffended–she tore into Reagan and her host had been a speech writer for Reagan. That leads to #2…
2) She was incredibly knowledgeable, well-spoken, and well-informed. THAT, I am pretty sure, is what scares the crap out of the Lefty opposition. So they frantically move to the tired old (but too often effective) tactic of villainizing her and trying to marginalize her.
See, they don’t want to debate her. They have nothing in terms of debate to counter her well-reasoned arguments, so they just disparage her and try to lock her out of the conversation. In a battle of wits, she would absolutely crush and humiliate them. They can’t win on the merits, so they move to ad hominem attacks. She is no wilting violet (she expects others to rationally defend their positions and quickly identifies and pushes hard on their “soft” spots), so she makes an attractive target. Yes, feminists on the Left always say that a woman should always competently speak her mind–except for Ann Coulter.
The bottom line is that Coulter is an extremely effective advocate for the Right, and she scares the crap out of the Left (and rightly so). So, just like they re-defined the NAZIs as being right when they were really Left, they re-define Coulter as being too outrageous to be taken seriously. They don’t want to have to actually defend their ideas. They don’t want to debate her on TV. They certainly don’t want the public to actually hear her. That would be incredibly dangerous–and with YouTube they can’t even afford to debate her on TV because it will live forever.
But like in the NAZI example above, that fear of debate is only because they have no cogent response to Coulter and they will quickly be seen as having no clothes. They can’t tolerate the idea that their cherished beliefs are proven wrong, and they certainly can’t tolerate being publicly exposed as an intellectual lightweight.
It is cowardice and intellectual dishonesty the keeps the Lefty mainstream media from debating Coulter. They know that they cannot beat her, so they marginalize her. I defy any person to bring up a single irrational point that Coulter has argued. Go ahead and try. Put your money where your mouth is. Time to put up or shut up.
I absolutely don’t mind disagreement. At all. What I hate is folks who are intellectual featherweights pretending like they’ve got the goods.
“home brewed”email server was secure and was never hacked. That is a very obvious lie. But then again, she is well known to be a liar.
As is abundantly documented, “Guccifer” hacked into her “secure”server and published a few of her emails. Does she think we don’t remember that? And if “Guccifer” could do it, you can bet that virtually every country (both friend and foe) did, as well. Probably in real time as she typed. And much of what she emailed is now considered at least “Sensitive.”
She is a liar, and not a particularly good one, at that. Bill was a great liar–it was his native language and he was a master. Hillary has learned well from him, but while she certainly has no problem telling lies, she only does it with a bit of an accent–it’s relatively easy to tell that she is lying.
Unfortunately, we have a lap-dog mainstream press that pretends they believer her crap and tries to get US to believe it…