RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Crime’ Category

It really

07 Mar

isn’t out of the question.

 
Comments Off on It really

Posted in Crime

 

A great

07 Mar

article. And the blogfather notes the problem:

But have you noticed? While all this head-spinning legal jibber-jabber goes back and forth, the foundation of the false narrative we’ve been hearing since November 8 has vanished. Now that we’re supposed to believe there was no real investigation of Trump and his campaign, what else can we conclude but that there was no real evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia . . . which makes sense, since Russia did not actually hack the election, so the purported objective of the collusion never existed.

There either was good evidence given to the media or there was not. Either Obama was illegally leaking to smear a political foe or he wasn’t. So which is it? Follow me, here.

If Obama was not illegally and unethically gouging Trump, then how did the media get that information slamming him? Did opponents and the media and Democrats (though I repeat myself) just make it all up? Where did they get information? But then again, if all the lamestream media and Democrats said was just a damnable and made up lie, why on earth should anyone believe them now? They have admitted to just making crap up. Under the bus they go! Say “Hi” to all the others there…

But then if what they said was true (as far as they knew) and Obama was leaking like a sieve and they had illegal access to confidential information and details of Presidential persecution, doesn’t that prove that Obama himself is a criminal? Or at the very least a liar?

They are caught between the Scylla and Charybdis.

When you lie down with pigs, you inevitably get some mud on yourself… Now the MSM has to say where they stand, if they hew to any logical consistency whatsoever. Then again, logic has never been a strong point for these folks, eh?

If what they said is just made-up nonsense, then no sentient being gives a crap about what they say now. If what they say is true, their boyfriend Obama is a criminal. See, the MSM depends on the stupidity and illogic and apathy of the public to not get that (gee, sounds like Obamacare–this is a pattern for these guys).

I mean, Comey said that there was just no evidence of any connection between the Russians and the Trump campaign and then he said that there was no investigation. That is likely true–there was never any reason for an investigation.

But then just how could one know that unless an investigation had been done? I mean, you can’t say both that there was no Russian interference and that you didn’t do an investigation! If you know that there was no interference, you obviously did an investigation! DUH!

What they say is just not internally consistent. Methinks they are liars…

 
Comments Off on A great

Posted in Buffoons, Crime, Lamestream Media

 

Morality

06 Mar

is more than just meaningless window dressing and mindless repression. Reputation means a lot. We are seeing that in spades right now.

So Obama is accused of doing illegal “dirty tricks” on Trump.

Does anyone think that Obama really would not do such a thing? I think that most everyone figures he probably did do it. He may well get off scot free, but he likely did it. It totally fits with what we know about him. There is absolutely no reason to think he would be morally opposed to such a thing.

This goes way beyond personal politics and into personal morality. I have not seen a single defense of Obama saying that he would never do such a dastardly deed. There may indeed be issues of proving it, but no one thinks he would never actually do it. Guilt or innocence is to be decided by facts on the ground, but it is clear that Obama would certainly DO such a thing if he thought he could get away with it. His own morality does not defend him, here. Quite the opposite.

In other words, he is weighed morally in the balance and found wanting. Yes, there may be a legal technicality that keeps him out of prison, but we all know the cut of this man’s moral jib.

That’s why this accusation, true or false, is so damaging. It is totally in line with the Obama we know. In other words, the chickens are coming home to roost.

 
 

This is

06 Mar

dang ugly.

I have NO difficulty at all believing that Obama did this. He is a moral dirtbag.

But if true, it is despicable. It is totally criminal and should result in jail time.

Trump is far more likely to be the one telling the truth, here. And Obama is far more likely to be a criminal.

I’m quite certain Obama will get away with it, but he appears to deserve a stiff prison sentence. He is, in all likelihood, guilty as Hell. This is exactly the kind of thing he would do. His overweening and pathological narcissism would quickly lead him there. It’s just not hard to see this happening. And many of his people, when threatened with prosecution, will squeal like a stuck pig. They will suck up to the new boss and try to keep their fancy mansions (and stay out of jail).

Additionally,  this is exactly what makes it likely for conservative fence-sitters to fully come on board with Trump. Defending Trump against Obama in this case is very easy. So this kind of crap may end up making Trump even more popular and opposing him even more difficult.

If there is a good reason to think that the Obama actually did this (even if–maybe especially if–he is not prosecuted), it will be hard to criticize Trump for any perceived misdeeds or shortcomings. It will make it hard for Obama to effectively snipe at Trump from the sidelines, as he is planning on doing. It will also kill Obamacare and the Iran deal. And it is the end of all the Obama supporters in Congress. If true or even probably true, they are facing an electoral bloodbath in two years.

 
 

Be prepared

06 Mar

for a slew of fake news on FISA-gate.

The wording will be carefully parsed so as to be in a sense true. Like the teen who says to his father, “I didn’t wreck your car while driving drunk” when in fact the car is registered in both the father’s and the wife’s name–so it technically is not totally his dad’s car at all! Yeah, the boy wrecked the car while under the influence, but it was not just his dad’s car, and he was high, not drunk, anyway… So the teen answered (technically) truthfully when he didn’t drive dad’s car drunk and wreck it.

We are seeing the exact same thing, here.

A great quote:

Senator Cotton captures the point in a quotable quote: “If you want to know what a pro-Russia policy would look like, Chris, here are some elements of it. You’d slash defense spending. You’d slow down our nuclear modernization. You’d roll back missile defense systems. You would enter a one-sided nuclear control arms agreement. And you’d try to do everything you could to stop oil and gas production. That was Barack Obama’s policy for eight years. That’s not Donald Trump’s policy.”

 
Comments Off on Be prepared

Posted in Crime

 

If you care one bit

04 Mar

about the country or rule of law, this is a VERY big deal. The biggest by far in three generations.

We are talking HUGE repercussions, here.

 
 

Gee, makes

11 Jan

you wonder why, eh? Could it be that they were hiding something? It just seems… fishy.

And then this money quote: The report concluded that… [there was] no evidence of vote tampering.

Yeah, NO EVIDENCE OF VOTE TAMPERING! None. Nada. So remember this when you hear Lefties whine and moan about “tampering” with the election. Someone did indeed hack th DNC and Podesta, revealing all sorts of dirty deeds by Hillary. BUT THERE WAS NO VOTE TAMPERING!

If you didn’t already know that Hillary was corrupt, I doubt you’re even conscious. Maybe you are part of the crowd of dead people who voted in Chicago…

Yeah, people knew what she was, and that is why she lost!

 
Comments Off on Gee, makes

Posted in Cowardice, Crime

 

Licensing is a

01 Jan

steaming pile of crap. It is just a protection racket. It has nothing in reality to do with protecting the public. It’s a scam.

 
4 Comments

Posted in Crime, Freedom

 

The issue of a pardon

16 Dec

for Hillary is a complicated one. On one hand, Obama really doesn’t like the Clintons and vice-versa. And most people do NOT want to see that happen. It would be a huge black eye for the Democrats. Yet it would be far more politically palatable for Obama to do it rather than Trump (for Obama). The truth is that it is in Obama’s best interest to issue Hillary a pardon, though he will grit his teeth while doing it.

If I were a betting man, I would just bet that Obama issues her a pardon. He has to. The discovery would be a nightmare for HIM personally, since he himself is very much implicated. He sent Hillary emails under an alias, which clearly shows that a) he knew what he was doing was illegal, and b) he planned with intent and malice aforthought to keep that from the public. Yeah, he simply can’t afford to have this go to trial. Even if eventually he were found to be technically “not guilty” in a court of law, the court of public opinion would certainly convict him. He cannot afford to leave this to Trump. That would simply not be a wise or safe course of action. He doesn’t know for sure what Trump will do, and the stakes are astronomically high. He can’t rely on Trump for the pardon. So to pardon her is to protect himself. Yes, there will be squawks about the injustice of it all, but after a few years it will be gone.

 
 

Could be,

30 Nov

but I doubt it. See, she would have to have a conscience in the first place, and it is quite clear that she doesn’t. Quite.

Speaking of Hillary’s criminality, I really do wonder if this recount thing makes Trump more likely to pursue criminal charges against her. I mean she has really poked the tiger! This was stupid of her. Totally stupid. And for no reason–the recounts are a sure failure. All this does is make Hillary look like a spoiled, petulant, nasty, and sore LOSER along with provoking Trump. Bad move. Really bad.

What could well happen once Trump takes the Presidency is that he lets Sessions loose to indict her (it’s not him, after all!), and then partway through the trial (after the prosecution and before she rebuts the charges) Trump issues her a pardon. She is widely seen as guilty, and that sticks while Trump looks generous.  Of course, she takes the pardon (does she even have a choice?) but she has no chance to make the case in the public court that she is not slimy as all get-out.

Trump gets to look magnanimous and Hillary looks to all the world like the crook she is. Trump talks about how the country needs to move on from Hillary, etc.

Of course, half of he same thing would happen if Obama pardons her on the way out. That is probably the best possible outcome for her and it will indeed likely happen that way, though Obama hates her (and rightly so). But Obama himself is very much criminally implicated; his emails were on her private server under an alias (which shows criminal intent). So he may pardon her to keep certain things from coming to light. I doubt that he dares leave her to be possibly prosecuted by Trump and have that stuff come out. Discovery would be a HUGE problem for him. And it would be the highlight of the decade for me. And Obama loves himself most of all, dontcha know? He Himself is the dearest thing to him, by far. So the pardon won’t come from Trump, it will come from Obama.

hillary-pardon