RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Psychopathology’ Category

Folks, it’s a

24 Jul

witch hunt. And I don’t give a rat’s patoot now WHAT he says. He is just not trustworthy.

With all that funding and with a HUGE staff of Lefty attorneys eager to besmirch Trump, they got NOTHING. So Mueller “expanded” his fishing expedition to include Trump’s historical financial dealings. The expansion itself tells you that he found absolutely nothin regarding the real issue. But he just can’t leave empty-handed, so there is this “expansion.” It is truly a mania, an irrational impulse. He is Captain Ahab in the flesh.

And Mueller can kiss my butt.

Mueller is a TOTAL–well, I can’t say on this family blog. but I didn’t spend 7 or so years with Marines not to know how to describe him in the most vulgar of terms. And I really don’t care what this Javert says, now. He is a psychopathological moral midget. I think HE is the one that should be prosecuted and put in prison for fraud. His relationship with Comey alone disqualifies him and is immoral if not outright illegal. And yet he didn’t even demur let alone refuse the appointment? He didn’t even publicly disclose it? REALLY? What a horse’s butt! Anyone with morals would have disclosed the relationship and then refused the appointment. He did neither, and that should tell you all you need to know about his moral fiber. Or, in his case, his moral tissue paper.

Just get out of here, you idiot! You’re just here for the blood money. Be off with you!

 

Ah, well,

11 Jul

never mind, then.

This is all stupidity. It is the mindless rantings of a “snowflake” Left who is not use to reality. They LOST.

 
Comments Off on Ah, well,

Posted in Buffoons, Psychopathology

 

This truly is the bottom line:

10 Jul

Those arguments pushing for restriction of campus concealed carry are NOT based on logic, reason, or evidence. ANYONE arguing for concealed carry is virtually always more logical and rational than the gun-controller nuts. Own it, anti-gun nuts!

See, it’s not even a close call. It is simply easily seen facts. Easily seen by one side, anyway. The gun controller nuts are just too beholden to their tired old ideology to be flexible in looking at the facts. They are just too rigid and narcissistic to see that they are (and have been for some time) WRONG.

One can’t even give them the benefit of the doubt in this case–it is simply delusion. It is not an issue where reasonable people can disagree, because there are no data supporting their position; THERE IS NO REASON TO THE GUN-CONTROLLER-NUT POSITION! They believe nonsense. It is like someone who argues that at night 100 fairies come out and dance on their lawn, led by Santa Clause and Unicorns. What should you “compromise” and agree that 50 fairies come out and dance on their lawn? There is no conceptual “meet in the middle” ground, here. They are just wrong. Holy crap!

And this is a MAJOR issue with the gun control freaks: There just IS no actual data to support their pathetic and irrational assertions. Yet they hold those beliefs with delusional and/or even religious intensity. Religious, like with Global Warming. Those of us who are empirically-oriented and data-driven just shake our heads sadly.

Gun-controller nuts have to face one incontrovertible fact: THERE IS NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR POSITION! They bring a can of Silly String to a gunfight… (to paraphrase).

Go soak your head, gun-controller nuts. This argument is for big boys and girls, not for intellectual panty-waists who can’t reason their way out of a paper bag. You don’t even have “big-boy pants” to put on, so get out of here–things are way over your head. Just be a good little boy or girl and go color in your “Safe Spaces.” Leave this to the intellectual grown-ups…

 
Comments Off on This truly is the bottom line:

Posted in Guns, Psychopathology

 

Yes, it’s

25 Jun

a plague.

I personally find the Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) both mindless and juvenile. I certainly understand not liking the policies of the current President, and even thinking the President is a despicable human being. Hey, I lived through the Obama years! And I even understand being under-enthused about Trump–he was not my first choice in the Republican primaries.

But TDS is something different entirely. A precious snowflake can whine that Trump is, “Not my President,” but in fact, he is. It’s not all abut you. Shocker, I know. One can whinge and carp about imagined Russia interference, but that is just delusion and avoidance of reality. Time to grow up. You may have gotten your overweening narcissism from your parents’ teachings and they way they parented, but at some point YOU are responsible.

These “protestors” were the same one that told those of us who disagreed with Obama to just shut up and toe the line and that patriotism demands it. But they can’t walk that walk! They were full of crap.

Part of being an adult is managing the fact that I don’t always get what I want. Our college-aged “precious snowflakes” are learning that now. But all too often their parents never learned that lesson. The deficit is multi-generational. So this generation is called to rise above their parents. I really hope they manage that.

 
Comments Off on Yes, it’s

Posted in Psychopathology

 

The morally execrable James Comey.

12 Jun

Comey is a criminal. The very fact that Comey leaked these documents to a friend with the understanding that they would be then given to the media is proof positive that a) Comey knew it was wrong and quite likely illegal and b) that he needed to leak it in a way that didn’t show his own “fingerprints.” He totally knew it was wrong and that’s why he took steps to hide it. Otherwise, he could have just written an op-ed himself! That he didn’t speaks volumes.

So we have both demonstrated Mens Rea and Actus Reus. This is a crime.

Yeah, there’s really no question whether there was criminal intent. There obviously was and that’s why Comey did it that way. DUH!

And to me there is another very interesting and rather obvious question—why did Comey give self-damning testimony to Congress? Did he want to go to prison? I think there are two reasons:

  • He is dumb. He was just not smart enough to keep his yapper closed. That is almost for sure related to his personal psychopathology–he was “dissed” and he just had to lash back. He couldn’t tolerate the narcissistic insult. He simply could not shut up. It is not in his psychological make up.
  • He is so “in the bubble” that all he could see is “resistance” and he could not see the obvious criminality. So it never even crossed his mind that this could be a real problem. He needs to get out of DC once in a while. That is also a form of psychopathology and is related (strongly) to his narcissism. He just could not entertain alternate explanations–he has never even heard them. He plays the role of Pauline Kael, here. HE was right! HE is the measure of all things! HIM! Everyone else is just furniture.

I think there is no question that Comey is an egregious showboat who leaked FBI information and who should be in prison.

I hope he soon will be. That is richly and obviously deserved.

But also, it would be a significant warning to other would-be leakers to have him go to prison. And that is in fact arguably the most important thing. If Comey were to get off scot-free, what message would it send to other leakers who fancy themselves to be part of “the resistance?”

 
Comments Off on The morally execrable James Comey.

Posted in Buffoons, Corruption, Psychopathology

 

Leftist regimes

22 May

have always focused on the children. The NAZIs did it, the USSR was famous for taking kids from parents, etc.

But why? Why such focus on the children?

Here is the reason: Leftism depends on narcissism and traditional families don’t reliably inculcate that, so the gummint takes the kids away. One child only is ideal for that. See, there is a need to cultivate the desire for someone to match every want and meet every need. Gov’t is happy to fill that role–though of course they will need to control everyone and take from those who have.

Leftism in many ways is defined by narcissism and depends on such personality pathology in order to survive. So they take kids in order to “groom” that.

Parenting and political philosophy are closely linked.

 
Comments Off on Leftist regimes

Posted in Parenting, Political Philosophy, Psychopathology

 

I think that

16 May

this is culturally really quite important.

It truly means that leaders have no “skin in the game,” so to speak. One acts quite differently when one is worried about kids and grandkids rather than just oneself. Religion becomes far more important. Certain traditional values become crucial. One’s whole world view is drastically changed with children. Nothing is more common than new parents who marvel at how their basic personality and existence have drastically changed.

It is the ultimate expression of narcissism to, out of choice, not have kids (I am certainly NOT talking about people who are childless through no choice of their own). It is the wholesale discarding of traditional mores. It is the ravenous eating of the seed corn because it is more convenient and WE have no children, anyway. We need to understand that there are corollaries that naturally accompany such actions–that choice is rooted in one’s very personality and doesn’t spring up ex nihilo.

 
Comments Off on I think that

Posted in Culture, Psychopathology

 

It’s a good

02 May

article. Very good. Though I think the first section is by far the best.

But at root of this is an overweening narcissism. Rather than take an unflinching look at themselves, they seek to avoid personal blame by concocting a fairy tale conspiracy theory. And this “precious snowflake” narcissism is indeed the sickness of our time. They embody this ethos.

 
Comments Off on It’s a good

Posted in Politics, Psychopathology

 

Let’s be

11 Apr

brutally honest for a moment here: Hillary did NOT lose because she is a woman. She lost because she was an unbelievably sucky candidate. She lost because normal people wanted change and she was the poster child for the same ol’ same ol’.  She lost because people were sick to death of Obama and yet felt the cultural “tug” of not openly criticizing him because he is black. To blame it on misogyny is both wrong and stupid, and believing THAT story is a sure way for Democrats to miss the salient point entirely. It is, at heart, psychologically defensive. It is incredibly self-serving. The first step in real change is to admit you were wrong. Democrats have studiously avoided that first step.

But to acknowledge that a) Barack Obama sucked as President and b) that Hillary sucked as a candidate is, perhaps, too painful for many to do.  The misogyny excuse or the Russia excuse both allow one to frame the loss in some kind of a heroic narrative. People don’t have to admit that they themselves were snookered. But theses explanations also prevent people from making real changes. And that is the real damage.

See, if it’s all misogyny or all the Russians, I can avoid all that introspection. I can avoid real change. Nothing is my fault and there is therefore nothing else I can do.  It’s all the Russians or misogyny. I didn’t do it–it was those knuckle-dragging others did it (the theme of this generation). I can do nothing and need to change nothing (as my personality pathology already dictates). And THOSE are the wages of the Snowflake Generation.

THIS is the end result of a lifetime of believing that there are no losers and that everyone should get a trophy. But (as noted in Alice In Wonderland) when all have won and therefore must have prizes, the “race” is totally meaningless. As the villain in The Incredibles said, “When everyone is super, no one is super.”

Yep.

 
Comments Off on Let’s be

Posted in Psychopathology

 

It is dang funny

21 Feb

that “Trump Derangement Syndrome” now involves frank pyschosis. I mean,  now the press is going around the twist. They are just nuts.

 

 
Comments Off on It is dang funny

Posted in Psychopathology