RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Media Bias’ Category

Please understand,

24 Apr

there was never any reasonable evidence of Trump colluding with the Russians. It was a Democrat dodge from the get-go. It was always a frantic effort to draw attention away from how crappy a candidate Hillary was.

It was always a lie and a dodge.

The fact that it gained traction and currency among the more gullible and hide-bound parts of the population is merely a demonstration of the credulous nature of the people. Those people expected the MSM to tell the truth. Foolish move. Welcome to 2017, you unsophisticated hick.

Times have changed.

There are other sources of information now, and the MSM no longer has a stranglehold on information. Now they must confront alternative accounts of events, and do so creditably. See, the key word here is, “creditably.”

But that brings up another issue: the MSM has “shot their wad” on this and now there is little left. They have hyped a theme that is simply not true, and now they reap the predictable result now that we know for a fact that it is not true–no one believes them anymore. Even my Lefty friends are more skeptical, now.

I mean, the MSM said over and over that Trump was a monster who couldn’t win and couldn’t govern if he did. Then they said he was a Russian stooge Yet they were wrong. On all counts. They have, shall we say, pooped in the soup. And now it can never be right again.

They have endorsed the trendy Post-Modernism of the Academy in order to attack their idealogical opponents, but Post-Modernism (certainly in the hands of rubes) is a vicious dog that now turns and rends its owners. Now they are on the recieving end of the whip that they themselves crafted and gleefully used on others. It was great when they held the handle of the whip…

As a great philosopher once said, “Welcome to the party, pal!”

See, if there is no truth as the Post-Modernists gleefully argue, why on earth should I believe them? Let’s see them answer that simple question.

 

So, any

17 Apr

guesses as to how long the Trump/Russia MSM fraud will go on? This is just stupid. And no mention of the obvious Hillary financial collusion with Russia.

I mean, the usual Lefty media suck-up beta males have gone on ad naseum about how Russia “hacked” the election for Trump, but that is a damned lie. Let’s call it what it is. It’s just a bunch of crap, and the MSM are snivelling idiots and partisan hacks. No wonder no thinking person cares one whit about what they say! They are just not at all reliable. Nothing they say can taken at face value. They lie. What a steaming pile of hoo-hah! Get that weak stuff out of here! It’s just a lame effort to lie and de-legitimize Trump. Lamey, lamey, lame-O. They are merely mindless amanuenses for Hillary. They are NOT a primary or reliable source.

No thinking non-hack person who has even a passing acquaintance with the facts would buy such obvious and grotesque nonsense. It’s a testament to stupidity and hackishness that it is still going. It’s a lot like bad crotch rot–it’s painful, serves no purpose, and it won’t go away.

Here’s the truth: Hillary wrote emails to Podesta that showed she is a total moral dirtbag (though that obvious fact was already well known by anyone who had two brain cells to rub together for warmth) and someone hacked into these emails to Podesta and brought them to light. No elections were “hacked”–that is a complete and total lie. She was merely exposed. DUH! I mean, you gotta be totally stupid or totally ignorant to join in this foolishness. Or you could be a dishonest hack… These folks are just whining losers. Just shut up, you fools!

I’m really sick of this crap-eating nonsense. C’mon, man! Grow up–there is no crying in politics! It’s time to put on your big boy pants and quit your whining you freakin’ wimps!

Puh-leeze, get this weak crap outta here!

 
Comments Off on So, any

Posted in Fraud, Media Bias

 

Yes,

17 Apr

increasingly likely.

Look, Obama was/is totally corrupt. He is more sly than Hillary, who is brazenly corrupt–she can’t hide it–but he is every bit as corrupt as she is. They are both wannabe dictators.

There was laughter and mocking on the Left when Trump tweeted that Obama had “tapped his wires.” But it was fundamentally true, even if inelegantly spoken. And for the Lamestream hack media, the focus was on the inelegance, not the truth that would sully their hero and boyfriend.

Obama is far worse than Nixon. But he sure gets a lot more leash from the MSM!

The hard truth is that you can’t depend on the MSM to give you the unvarnished facts. They lie and have a socio-political ax to grind. They just are not a reliable source, plain and simple. They might tell the truth by accident once in a while, but that doesn’t change the indisputable fact that they lie and deceive on matters of politics as a general rule.

 

Oh, so Donald Trump

13 Apr

was right and the MSM, like usual, was a pack of lying jackals and propagandists. Gee, what a surprise. If you are totally stupid, that is.

No wonder thinking people no longer give a crap about the incessant yapping of the MSM! No wonder Trump was elected. Maybe the MSM should try telling the TRUTH. I know that is not in their nature, but they could at least try… I might as well believe an itinerant hellfire-and-damnation TV evangelist as the NY Times! They are both in it for the money, power, and prestige. Tale as old as time…

Sorry, we live in a Post-Modern world where there is no Truth, only opinion. And that is exactly what the MSM are dishing up (though ultimately this vicious dog turns and mauls its owner). It has long permeated academia and is now becoming part of the culture. OK, I buy it. You’ve convinced me. But now you cannot defend yourself.

Isn’t Post-Modern academia itself vulnerable to the very same critique as the objects of its criticism? Doesn’t this double back on itself? Nice work, Post-Modernists. You have convincingly pointed out the logical flaws in Positivism, but in doing so you yourself have open up the means to your own logical destruction! Yes, the Positivists are wrong, but aren’t YOU just as wrong and for the exact same reasons? Are YOU not vulnerable to the exact same criticisms? Methinks your are hoisted on your own petard…

So the ONLY rational approach is that I need to find a Truth-Teller–a real person with whom I can have a human relationship. Of course, that puts me out of the secular realm entirely, though it seems that there is no way to both hew eclusively to the secular realm AND believe in Truth.

And if there is indeed no Truth as the Post-Modernists say, on what grounds should I believe THEM over a dog-faced baboon or some stranger creature still? If all there is is opinion, on what logical grounds is their opinion better than mine? We all have a face, so why is yours better than mine? See, here is where the dog turns on its master and mauls him…

Sure, there may be socially constructed standards of beauty, but that is merely to argue that truth is socially constructed–including… YOURS! Some cultures value big butts and find them attractive. Others value the slim-hipped look. But is one fundamentally better than the other? If so, how do you know? It’s just your preference. You like curvy women and I like thin “athletic” ones. At best it is a culturally-familially-determined preference rather than Truth, but there are other cultures! There are other families! Don’t be so ethnocentric and chauvinistic, you knuckle-dragging mouth-breather…

See, if I reject categorically the existence of a Truth-Teller, I just drift rudderless on the Godless sea of modernity. Let’s say that religion is not my cup of tea. Well, then I have ruled out the very possibility of Truth. Yeah, THAT approach is “scientific!” It leads me again to ask why I should believe YOU over a dog-faced baboon? On what rational grounds are YOU standing?  (thanks, Socrates).

 
Comments Off on Oh, so Donald Trump

Posted in Buffoons, Dog-faced Baboon, Epistemology, Media Bias

 

This is a HUGE

05 Apr

issue. Let me just say again that Trump was right, and all the supercilious naysayers were wrong. Again. Susan Rice criminally leaked.  Eat it, Obama suck-ups, eat that poop!

But this is just horrible. It is disgusting. What Rice did has a penalty of 10 years in a federal prison. Who else was in on it? This makes Richard Nixon look like a piker. But Obama defends her like she was… his wife…

And don’t underestimate just how close Rice is to Obama. They now live in the same house. Think about that for just a moment. Would your spouse allow that? I know that if my wife wanted another adult man (close associate) to move in, I would be gone in a heartbeat. Wouldn’t you?

Rice is NOT in the house next door. She did NOT rent a condo in the area. She is NOT at a nearby hotel. She lives with Barack Obama and his formal wife. Mike Pence got flak for saying he would not go out to dinner alone with a woman who is not his wife. So what do you make of Barack Obama living with Susan Rice?

As Margaret Houlihan said on M*A*S*H when in line for roll call and Frank Burns’ name was called right after her’s, “Just friends, sir!”

I have not heard that Obama is a polygamist (not that there is anything WRONG with that…) but most of the time your wife (or sister-wife #1 in this case) does not want another woman to move in on a permanent basis unless they are indeed “sister-wives.”  Is this one of those rare exceptions to that rule? I dunno, but I usually would bet with the odds. And the strong odds are that this is a polygamous situation.

But back to the ranch… This is also a major media problem. They have been unmasked (no pun intended) as horrible Obama shills. They have not covered themselves in glory, they have covered themselves in caca.

 
Comments Off on This is a HUGE

Posted in Corruption, Media Bias

 

New frontiers in media bias.

04 Apr

It pretty dang clear. Pelley got pwned, here.

If you blithely accept what the MSM says, you are a blamed fool.

So here we have a guy (Cernovitch) saying that Hillary has Parkinson’s Disease. Pelley says that Mike Cernovitch is wrong. Pelley says that Hillary had pneumonia and they know that because Hillary herself said that. But then Cernovitch asks the key question: Yeah, but how do you know that Hillary was telling the truth? All you have is her word on it. Why is her word somehow more reliable than my own lying eyes? Do I just pretend I didn’t see her lock up?

I mean, on what grounds should I believer her over a dog-faced baboon? That she wouldn’t lie? Uh, THAT is laughable! Puh-leez!

I don’t really believe anything Hillary says, anyway. As Bill Safire noted years ago, she is a congenital liar. Just how do you know she is not lying in this case? She certainly has lied in the past (and is famous for it), so how do you know she is not lying now? On what grounds are you standing? It’s time to put up or shut up.

She looks Parkinsonian. Whether or not that is the actual diagnosis, I don’t know. But something is up. I’m just glad she is not President…

 

There is more

03 Apr

than one way to be biased.

I remember seeing Bob Dole on (IIRC) Johnny Carson about two years before he ran for President. Efforts were made to make him look like a mean old man. They chose angles that were quite unflattering and which fed that narrative. He was a naturally funny guy who had great comedic instincts and timing. Yet he was made to look like a crotchety old curmudgeon. At the time I turned to my wife and said, “They think he will run, and this is battlespace preparation.” Yup, that turned out to be exactly correct. This has been happening for decades. At least.

 
Comments Off on There is more

Posted in Media Bias

 

Yeah,

14 Mar

no one trusts the MSM anymore.  It is SOOO 1991!

 
Comments Off on Yeah,

Posted in Media Bias

 

I agree.

13 Mar

Either put up or shut up. It’s quite clear that the best they’ve got is a pair of 3s. I call. Let’s see who wins and who is just a full-of-crap bluffer. The Democrat MSM just loves to pretend that there are links between Trump and Russia–but there are not.

They got nothin‘, A pair of 3s would be a big improvement to their hand! I call. The time for bluffing is over–show what you got.

 
Comments Off on I agree.

Posted in Media Bias

 

Look, Trump’s claim

13 Mar

that Obama wiretapped him is entirely plausible. Obama is KNOWN to have done this before, so it’s not like we can just say that Obama would never do such a thing. He would and he has. It is a pattern.

I know the Lamestream media and the usual Democrat media hacks (though I repeat myself)  have tried to make this seem like just an example of Trump’s paranoia, but that is just not true. So did Obama “bug” Trump? Yeah, most likely. Highly likely. Obama is just a bad, immoral guy. THIS is who he IS.

 
Comments Off on Look, Trump’s claim

Posted in Despotism, Dishonesty, Media Bias