I mean, I think most people (or at least reasonable, non-shill people) have realize that the New York Times is a very poor and very unreliable source. And what they are doing I’ll just continue that execrable tradition.
But I hope that more people are catching on now. The truth has become abundantly clear to even the dullest among us…
“Rather than running a photo of hostage Evyatan David being forced to dig his own grave by Hamas terrorists,” Ort posted, “and writing about the actual reaction of millions of Israelis to seeing it, the foreign desk and photo desk ran a photo of a relative handful of protestors in Tel Aviv,” which the NYT labeled “Hundreds Protest in Tel Aviv After Hostage Videos Surface From Gaza.”
The NYT sometimes actually does some good reporting, and sometimes even tells the truth. It’s just that you can never tell when they are telling the truth and when they are lying. Given that, one must take everything they say with a HUGE grain of salt.