of voter fraud, right Lefties? Watch the video. And weep.
California is always a cesspool of government corruption and rigged elections, and with major elections including the Los Angeles mayor and the state’s governor this year, it is particularly important that patriots make any effort possible to reduce election vulnerabilities. That is what Judicial Watch is looking to do by identifying and urging removal of inactive voter registrations, as the group’s president, Tom Fitton, explained.
… Never forget that, even though the major cities of California are heavily leftist, much of the state leans Republican, and even in the cities, there is more diversity of political thought than the Democrats would like. In the 2024 election, 10 California counties flipped red to vote for Donald Trump. As solidly blue as California seems to most of the country, it is not immune from the need for a little tampering to keep Democrats in full power.
And there is another aggravating thing: Voter fraud apologists claim that fraud is rare. Here’s how they argue it:
Let’s say that in a presidential election there are a total of 150 million votes cast across the nation. The total number of fraudulent votes is only, say, 100,000. So only a very small proportion of votes is actually fraudulent. Sounds pretty good, eh? Only something like .0006 percent.
But the problem is that these are national denominators. And yet our elections are not national, but a series of local elections. For example, let’s say that I live in a small state and there are only 1 million voters in the whole state. But it is a close race, and there are 100,000 fraudulent votes. Now 100,000 in the sea of 150,000,000 votes nationwide is indeed not very much. But in 1,000,000 votes it is something like 1%.
So I don’t really care what happens on a nationwide basis–I really care about what happens on the local level. Using a nationwide denominator is utterly deceptive. Because the number of fraudulent votes may indeed be small when compared to all the votes in the country, but it may not be at all insignificant when compared to my own state.
It is frankly deceptive to use a national denominator when a local denominator is what is appropriate. And if you catch someone doing it, you know they are lying to you. Knowingly or not, they are lying to you.
So here is the bottom line: People who want to minimize the effects of voter fraud use a national denominator. And it is mathematically indefensible because we are, in truth, not talking about a national election, we are talking about a series of local elections. That is why the correct denominator to use is the local voting population, not the national one. To use the national one is to be horribly deceptive. Anyone that uses that wrong denominator is either deliberately deceptive, or not really aware enough to know what is going on. Math is hard!
And we know this is a true because of the way people act. There is no way a person would commit a felony and risk legal problems if it made no difference whatsoever. That is just not how human beings work! The fact that people do this is proof positive that voter fraud is in fact a very important part of the outcome.