And assuming free and fair elections in the mid-terms (NOT a safe assumption), the Dems will get utterly creamed. They will certainly lose the House, and probably the Senate.
the outcome of a law and still be aware that it is bad law. And so it was with RvW.
You can be a big-time abortophile who wants every baby to be chopped up in the womb and yet still understand the legal weaknesses in RvW. It truly was one of the top 3 poor decisions the court has ever made! It is certainly as logically flawed as Dred Scott, and for the same reasons. Two peas in a pod…
Overturning RvW is NOT addressing the morality of abortion. It is ONLY returning jurisdiction to the states–where it rightly, constitutionally belongs. Please, don’t be confused on this. It is up to the people, through their elected representatives, to make this call.
The issue of abortion is rather incidental, here.
This really is not a tough intellectual issue, here.
A poll analyzing voters who supported former President Donald Trump in 2016 before casting a ballot for Biden in 2020 has found just 3 in 10 would back the incumbent again.
See, ALL theories of human nature are an amalgam of both good and evil. The issue is the ratio of good to evil.
And virtually ALL of what is good in Leftism is also found in Conservatism. I don’t have to go Leftist to care about the poor or the environment.
The Left promotes gun-barrel generosity. And I think that is immoral. And it’s really not something I can philosophically tolerate. It’s a deal-breaker for me. I think coercion should NOT be the first choice.
Now I understand that in this fallen world there are times when force is necessary–confining people in jail, for example. But it should only be done reluctantly, as the last and best possible option. Better to use persuasion and true concern.