On Nov. 28, the day after Thanksgiving, the 45th Planned Parenthood abortion center in the United States will shut its doors.

On Nov. 28, the day after Thanksgiving, the 45th Planned Parenthood abortion center in the United States will shut its doors.

I have is what does this mean for other states?
Planned Parenthood said that this would have “catastrophic consequences” on it since one-third of its revenue is funded by the government, according to an X post from law professor Jonathan Turley.
I guess we will see what others states do.
The decision allows other states to implement similar policies that would prevent reimbursements for services not related to abortions, such as screenings or acquiring contraceptives.
If other states follow, it is probably curtains for Planned Parenthood. I guess I don’t see how they could possibly survive. I guess we’ll see what happens…
a lot of Lefty abortophiles are just shocked by this.
I’m sure not.
Women across the country have been shocked to learn that mifepristone and misoprostol, pills designed to murder babies in the womb, might not be all that safe.
… Health experts from Planned Parenthood are encouraging women to ignore the latest concerning studies and have more abortions. “You’ll work up a tolerance to the potentially lethal side effects if you take the pill constantly,” said Dr. Ellen Mortia. “I recommend ignoring all warnings and ordering more mifepristone and misoprostol. We now offer them in cherry flavor!”
don’t want Trump to choose Sotomayor’s replacement. But I don’t think there is much of a choice. There just isn’t enough time.
Babies everywhere rejoice!
indeed differences between party philosophies.

But the truth is that MANY have fallen prey to demagoguery.

certainly understand how Democrats would be a little salty about that!
According to eyewitnesses, the young child was sitting in her stroller quietly, prompting the Democrats present to begin foaming at the mouth. “It’s just sickening to see a little child that is alive,” said rally attendee Sharon Marks. “It fills my heart with such abject fury, I just want to get in her little rosy face and scream every obscenity I can think of. What kind of hell are we living in where there are living children sitting around in strollers?”
agree with Ben Shapiro (and that’s OK), but here he kicks butt and takes names. Bravo to him!
It just keeps going from there, but I needed to stop transcribing it before my brain rotted. To summarize, what that woman was trying to do is what pro-abortion fanatics always do: They seek to invent any argument that avoids dealing with the moral issue of ending a human life. As Shapiro notes, no one could care about abortion if it only included c-sections in which the babies live. The entire point of the argument is over the termination of human life.
Pro-abortion radicals always seek to deflect because deep down, they know what is happening is morally wrong. Thus, they hang onto “exceptions” and the redefining of basic terms instead of just owning what they claim to support. [emphasis added]
And what really bothers me is that many people who consider themselves moral have this sideways support for infanticide. It is stunning moral contortionism! They are like early Paul/Saul in the Bible: They think they are morally OK if they don’t actually throw rocks at Stephen but just hold the cloaks of those who do…
can be pretty dang dangerous to certain populations!
these people are ghouls! Utter and disgusting ghouls. If you are not deeply offended, your moral compass is broken.
Newly released footage captured by undercover journalists in 2015 shows Planned Parenthood staff discussing the process of harvesting aborted baby parts and allegedly exposes a scheme to traffic them.
this latest position on abortion, he has others!
However, owing to campaign backlash, Kennedy pivoted, posting on social media that abortion legality should be upheld to a specific number of weeks, thereafter imposing restrictions.
… “Even in the reddest of red states, voters reject total abortion bans,” Kennedy tweeted, adding: “And on the other end, almost no one supports gruesome third-trimester abortions except to save the life of the mother.”
Well, he does, if you believe what he has said in the recent past! He said he supports, “The gruesome third-trimester” abortions! So now, what he supported last week is “gruesome,” eh?
Say… He’s not just chiseling in an effort to gain favor with as many sheep as possible, is he?
Kennedy’s tendency to alter his stance on abortion was observed previously when he initially supported a federal abortion ban after three months, only to retract this support mere hours later.