So why is a candidate who’s supposedly ahead spending heavily on a new ad to distance himself from GOP ads exposing his radical voting record in the Texas House? Winning campaigns don’t burn cash playing defense. This is a clear sign his campaign is in trouble.
“I am NOT a witch” is just never a good look…
The problem is that Talarico’s record exists, and both issues have dogged him since he launched his campaign. He voted against legislation that would have stopped foreign adversaries, China among them, from buying up big parcels of Texas land. He cast that vote while wealthy Chinese nationals were moving to purchase property near American military installations.
… And you don’t even have to take her word for it, you can take Talarico’s. He was just caught in undercover video making it clear his radical agenda hasn’t changed.
Like virtually all Democrats, he lies about what he actually believes and what he will actually do in order to get elected. That’s pretty much par for the course for Democrats everywhere, but especially in a place like Texas.
I would just say, “Texas voters, you DO realize you are being lied to, don’t you?”
I believe his internal polling is telling him the attacks on his record are working. The GOP has been hammering him on it, and judging by this new ad, he’s trying hard to fool the voters about who he really is. A candidate who’s comfortable with his numbers doesn’t cut an ad denying stuff. [emphasis added]
And absolutely, that’s what virtually ALL Democrat candidates in a contested race do–they try hard to fool the voters about who they really are! And it is an assault on democracy itself. Because then people can’t choose between two options! By lying about one’s positions, one destroys actual democracy and choice. Gee, a Leftist that fights against moral agency–whoda thunk? 🙄
Democrat candidacies simply can’t gain power if they tell the truth. It’s like the “California Karen-hair Karen” who came to my door to convince me to vote for a proposition that promoted “families” and “medical care” and “autonomy.”
Yep, you guessed it. It was actually all about increasing abortion. Funny how that never even came up from that person, and it was in none of her glossy brochures (uhm, who paid for all those, by the way?–they looked VERY expensive!).
Well, we know exactly why the word “abortion” was never used. Murdering babies just doesn’t fly all that well where I live, and abortion is, in fact, a horrifyingly disgusting procedure!
