Regardless of what corrupt slimeballs they are, Bill and Hillary Clinton will never have to face the music! Honestly, I don’t understand why, but there’s no question at all that Bill and his wife have flagrantly abused the law, yet seem to be above the law.
And I don’t believe that will change. I guess we can all take comfort in the fact that everyone knows that they are total dirtbags. Or much worse. Of course, they always evade justice, and that is more than a bit disappointing. But indeed, that is how things are.
Sadly, I’ve been around long enough to know that pinning anything on Bill or Hillary Clinton has about the same odds as hitting Powerball on consecutive weeks. These people are professional breakers and skirters of the law; they have been easily getting away with whatever they want for all of those same years that we have been crossing our fingers and hoping for their downfall.
it sounds really great! I love it. BUT… there IS no real excitement without an indictment. So the plans do indeed sound great. And I have great hopes for justice. But I think I’ll wait until there are actual results before I break out the celebratory Funyuns and Mt. Dew….
A retired FBI agent who assembled major crime cases for years says Attorney General Pam Bondi has a “slam dunk” conspiracy case to prosecute former federal agents and prosecutors for election meddling for relentlessly pursuing Donald Trump for political purposes while protecting prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton in the face of damning evidence.
Just as an aside, I think Pam Bondi has gotten a lot of undeserved criticism from impatient, angry, and jaded Conservatives. And to be honest, Conservatives have VERY good reasons to be impatient, angry, and jaded! Lefties seem to avoid justice over and over and over.
But I think the truth is that all this looked easy–open and shut–to Bondi at the outset. But the truth is that the miscreants were actually FAR harder to bring to justice than initially appeared. And Bondi is facing tough sledding. She can easily see the bad behavior, but most often it is juuuust out of her reach. Tantalizingly close, but in the end, nothing.
For example, we ALL see that Bill and Hillary are guilty scumbags through and through. And at LEAST Hillary is a chronic murderer (almost for sure Bill, too). It is SO obvious that it has become a running joke that if you have evidence against the Clintons, you will very soon die.
And Bill is famously a serial sex offender. And he has been for a very long time. The Epstein stuff is just the latest in a series of incidences, but by no means the first…
And yet, there are no convictions! We all know the truth, but there are not even indictments, let alone convictions, of either Clinton. Why do you think that is?
Because knowing something is true is very different than proving it in a court of law. And corrupt judges (particularly in DC) care FAR more about politics than they do about justice!
they didn’t have probable cause! Because this had nothing to do with the rule of law or justice. It was only about trying to jail a political opponent. You know, like other tin-pot dictators do!
Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel are preparing to turn over to Congress bombshell emails showing the FBI warned that the Biden Justice Department did not have probable cause to raid President Donald Trump‘s home at Mar-a-Lago, but prosecutors proceeded anyways, Just the News has learned.
…It has long been rumored that some FBI agents disagreed with the decision to raid Trump’s home to look for classified documents at the request of the National Archives.
But the soon-to-be released emails will chronicle the specific concerns that DOJ under President Joe Biden had not met the standard for a search warrant, but proceeded anyway, officials said.
The rogue judge concluded that Attorney General Pam Bondi lacked the authority to appoint Halligan. Currie ruled that all actions flowing from Halligan’s defective appointment, including securing and signing the indictments, constituted unlawful exercises of executive power and must be set aside.
But there is still some hope for justice. Hope.
During an appearance on Fox News, she warned the former FBI director to pump the brakes on his victory lap. “Well, what I will say is that everybody knows that James Comey lied to Congress,” Leavitt said. “It’s as clear as day, and this judge took an unprecedented action to throw these cases out to shield James Comey and Letitia James from accountability, based on a technical ruling. And the administration disagrees with that technical ruling. We believe the attorney in this case, Lindsey Halligan, is not only extremely qualified for this position, but she was, in fact, legally appointed. And I know the Department of Justice will be appealing this in very short order. So maybe James Comey should pump the brakes on his victory lap.”
Let us hope that it is not over. At the very least, we ALL know that Comey and James are dishonest scumbags who got off because of a grossly partisan judge. And we all know they are guilty as sin.
But there ARE no technicalities in the court of public opinion.
Bad laws, bad policy, and a lot of citizens who see dollar signs in their eyes if they slip and fall on city streets, as well as city employees who hear “cha-ching” when state legislatures grant them a potential liability windfall, have all contributed to the explosion of litigation.
stymied over and over by activist judges. The Supreme Court has smacked them down, but they are like cockroaches and are very hard to get rid of.
President Donald Trump’s ambitious agenda has been met with order after order from lower courts temporarily blocking him. Many of those have been lifted by the Supreme Court, handing Trump several wins and raising questions about how lower courts have been handling his cases.
But it is indeed time-consuming and frustrating. It is natural to the Supreme Court to be more active in quashing this kind of crap. It is happening, but only too slowly. And in fact, that is one of the main purposes of these bogus rulings. Everyone knows that they will be overturned, but it will take time, effort, and money to do so.
be great. But forgive me if I am a little slow to break out the celebratory Funyuns and Mountain Dew…
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) revealed that Congress may issue a subpoena to former President Barack Obama over allegations of a coordinated plot against President Donald Trump involving Russia during the 2016 presidential election.
Yes, but will they actually enforce it? Aye, there’s the rub. I doubt it. Because several people Democrats have simply ignored such subpoenas and not shown up. What makes anyone think Obama would be any different?
So I agree that there are huge crimes for which we need to ask some uncomfortable questions of Barack Obama. But I seriously doubt he will ever testify under oath. And I think that if he were given a subpoena, he would simply ignore it. Of course he would!
I’m not concerned about the Epstein files at all (and in fact, don’t want them released) is that I don’t believe for a minute that they are not totally and fatally compromised. They simply are not a reliable source. They have been in the hands of the dishonest Biden cabal for years, and we know good and well that they lie and change information–it’s well documented. So there’s no way of knowing whether or not the records give a true and faithful accounting of what actually happened.
There is just no way to know whether those records will tell us the truth or not. Yes, they will tell us something, but we have no idea whether or not what they are telling you is the truth. And that is a very dangerous legal thing.
Because the records may say that Fred Jones was a frequent passenger on the”Lolita Express,” but there’s not any way to know whether or not that is true. So if you make that charge, and drag Fred’s name through the mud, you certainly can’t convict him, and you may find yourself legally liable for damages.
Here’s the bottom line: We know that some very bad things happened. But we don’t have good legal evidence to back up the charges. And Epstein is conveniently dead. Convenient for some people, anyway.
There was a famous legal case years ago where two men were in an apartment with a woman and the woman was shot and killed. Obviously, one of the men did it. The problem is that each man very convincingly said that the other did it. And both men handled and put fingerprints on the gun. And there was no way to refute their testimony. So they both went free. The woman remained dead.
Frustrating, isn’t it? We’re in kind of the same position with the Epstein issues. We know very well that bad things happened. But we also are lacking solid evidence to be used in court. We have no decent chain custody for the evidence, and without an outright confession, nothing can be actually done. And there will never be a confession, of course.
So the aggravating and frustrating answer is that we should just move on.
get control of his judiciary, or there is a BIG TIME reckoning coming!
At this point the TROs are basically an automatic judicial veto on all new policy, and then the courts of appeals decide whether the judicial veto should be suspended. Whatever form of government that is, let’s please not call it “democracy.” https://t.co/75a0u7VYAp
the world run by the American Gestapo, comrade! Absolutely dystopian.
Well this is a horrifying story — a free speech advocate was arrested for saying something she never said, and was falsely accused of racism, until an out-of-control prosecutor finally admitted there was no support for the claim. https://t.co/OmN7KXe1NI
