Let me put this

in bald terms so that even Lefties can understand: Selective prosecution is both unconstitutional and disgusting.

Banana Republic of Brandon Injustice

Yeah, that’s not

rigged or NOTHIN’!

Don’t you just get sick of the obvious injustice? Even if you are a Lefty, doesn’t this kind of stuff give you pause?

Evil Injustice

Yeah, because

it is total bull-crap!

Can you just imagine the damage that a publicly speaking group of political prisoners would do to “Biden?” Yeah, it is no freakin’ wonder “Biden” wants to keep them safely (for him) incarcerated until after November!

MANY of us are mightily offended at the rank injustice of this!

Evil Foolishness Injustice

What the Left

has done is really disgusting. They better hope that the tables never turn!

Judging by the way the entire array of Democrat operatives at the federal, state, and local levels of law enforcement have scraped the bottom of the local pond, liberated copious amounts of scum, loaded DNC slingshots, and heaved the slime at former President Donald Trump, I’m thinking you might have low expectations for New York City trial, too. We can’t imagine why you’d feel that way.

Lefties, just stop! Please, stop. This NOT gonna work out the way you want it to!


The current Trump

trial is totally a farce. It is pure kangaroo court.

There are many problems with Bragg’s case, among them the statute of limitations issues, the unethical way he stacked the indictments, duct-taping a federal statute onto these New York misdemeanors to create a “criminal” case, the fact that non-disclosure agreements are legal instruments unless they attempt to cover up a crime, and reporting that work done by Trump’s attorney, Michael Cohen, was laid out as work done by an attorney. 

… So Trump is in court for making “false entry in the business records of an enterprise” 34 times. Ordinarily, these are misdemeanors, but the crime Bragg is asking a jury to get Trump on is an “elections” crime of stealing the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. 

… Bragg’s election claim is the same one that the Federal Elections Commission looked into and dismissed. It’s the same case Bragg’s predecessor refused to bring. It’s the same case laughed out of the federal Justice Department’s office in the southern district of New York.

Dementia Joe Injustice

Contempt is only

for Republicans, it seems!

Attorney General Merrick Garland risks being held in contempt of Congress after he refused on Monday to divulge the audio of President Joe Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur.

I’m just sick of the gross unfairness. Aren’t you? Garland (and Hunter) should be in jail, like Navarro is.

“It’s curious the Biden Administration is refusing to release the audio of President Biden’s interview with the Special Counsel after releasing the transcript,” it continued. “Why shouldn’t the American people be able to hear the actual audio of his answers? The American people demand transparency from their leaders, not obstruction.”

You KNOW why Garland is doing this, right? Those recordings lay bare what a doddering, demented old fool Biden really is. THAT’s why Garland is doing this. It’s electoral interference as well as covering for Joe Biden’s crimes.

Despicable Injustice

You know,

it’s pretty dang disgusting to those of us who value the rule of law. Honestly, Lefties, how to you support it and still sleep at night?

Current Events Evil Injustice

What a total

loser Ms. James is! She is an, well, I can’t say on a family blog, but to be more circumspect, I’ll just say that she is a butt.

I’m not a lawyer, but how is it even possible that Trump can’t appeal without paying the bond first? Seems like a pretty gross miscarriage of justice and quite obviously a Constitutional violation to me. I really don’t get it. It can’t stand in a free country!

And $175 million is just ludicrous! How is that even Constitutional? Cruel and unusual punishment, anyone? And you must post bail in order to appeal? Huh?

The hard Lefty Frank Luntz is totally correct, here:

Last month, pollster Frank Luntz warned Democrats that if New York Attorney General Letitia James seizes Trump’s assets, it could significantly boost Trump’s chances in the 2024 presidential election.

“I want you to remember this moment,” he said during a panel discussion on CNN. “And don’t forget it. If the New York Attorney General starts to take his homes away, starts to seize his assets, it’s all going to be on camera. Pundits are going to sit there and scream about this… You’re going to create the greatest victimhood of 2024, and you’re going to elect Donald Trump.”

Luntz continued, “If they take his stuff, he’s going to say that this is proof that the federal government — and the establishment and the swamp in Washington and all the politicians across the country in the attorneys general and all of this — that this is a conspiracy to deny him the presidency. He’s going to go up in the polls just like he went up every single time they indicted him.”

Disagreements I can understand, and even value. And MOST Americans value fairness and justice. But frank despotism and spittle-lipped oppression are things that are deeply offensive to me. And I’m far from alone on that point…

This is a dirty deal. And I’m offended by this empty-headed, foaming-at-the-mouth persecution!

Aren’t YOU?


I do indeed think

that jailing Trump for speaking out against this obvious injustice would indeed make him a modern Nelson Mandela. Can you just imagine the PR problem that would cause Leftists?

Let’s just say that if the judge strikes Trump down, Trump will become more powerful than the judge can ever imagine…

Gross, transparent unfairness such as this really torques regular people off. Democrats need to be very careful, here. This is NOT a good time for them to get all spittle-lipped and let their Lefty coercion freak flag fly!


Well, he’s

right, you know

I mean, sure he’s wacko Lefty, but he is right, here.