this. HIS policies led to the murder of Laken Riley. Yet he is so unconcerned, that even when he is forced to mention Laken Riley in his SOTU speech, he gets her name wrong, calling her “Lincoln.”
Speaking to millions of Americans in his annual State of the Union address the president twice called her ‘Lincoln’ as he held up a pin bearing her name, which had been given to him by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.
So who gives people their lives, health, jobs, and fertility back?
Publisher of Nature and Scientific American platforms COVID vaccine skeptics. CDC drafted alert about post-vaccination heart inflammation early in rollout but feared looking “alarmist,” emails suggest.
… The Springer Nature medical journal Cureus, sibling to Nature and Scientific American, published a peer-reviewed paper by high-profile mRNA vaccine critics last month, showing the growing mainstream openness to data and arguments once nitpicked if not ignored by publishers and suppressed by academia and Big Tech.
It’s really disheartening to see what has happened.
While early reports from the mRNA trials said the novel vaccines “could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms,” re-analysis of Pfizer’s trial data “identified statistically significant increases” in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the intervention group, which then became unmistakable after emergency use authorization, the Cureus paper says.
… “The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted,” the paper also states.
Look, I’m already immuno-compromised because of the MS drug I take. There’s no way in Hell I would get the mRNA “vaccine.”
It is NOT a vaccine! DUH! The larger medical community should be ashamed of themselves!
I think it may be time to leave Amazon as much as possible. PublicSquare is an alternative, as is Walmart online. But I agree, it is hard. Still, there is a moral issue at stake, here.
No surprise, I think she is dead wrong. Some of the toady hacks are that way in the sense that they are “true believers,” and will happily suck down whatever kool-aide the Democrat Big-Wigs give them, but not the regular people.
You know, this is dereliction of duty. Their JOB is to know what is in the bill BEFORE voting for or against it!
Whenever The Firm™️ engages in this practice, it largely excludes nearly every senator from the constitutionally prescribed process in which all senators are supposed to participate. By so doing, The Firm™️ effectively disenfranchises hundreds of millions of Americans — at least for purposes relevant to the legislation at hand — and that’s tragic. It’s also un-American, uncivil, uncollegial, and really uncool.
… I still don’t know exactly what’s in this bill, although I have serious concerns with it based on the few details The Firm™️ has been willing to share. But under no circumstances should this bill — which would fund military operations in three distant parts of the world and make massive, permanent changes to immigration law — be passed next week. [emphasis added]
Donald Trump’s legal team is set to use a previously undisclosed “conflict of interest” as grounds for appealing a recent verdict that orders the former president to pay advice columnist E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million. Trump attorney Alina Habba told the New York Post she was previously unaware that Manhattan federal Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over the case, worked with Roberta Kaplan, Carroll’s attorney, at the Paul Weiss Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison law firm in the early 1990s.
The National Security Agency (NSA) has admitted to buying records from data brokers detailing which websites and apps Americans use, US Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) revealed Thursday.
This news follows Wyden’s push last year that forced the FBI to admit that it was also buying Americans’ sensitive data. Now, the senator is calling on all intelligence agencies to “stop buying personal data from Americans that has been obtained illegally by data brokers.”
Now, the next question is this: Once they gathered the information, did they act on it? Are there people in jail now because of what they did?