says it’s not a vaccine! And that is a HUGE problem for Pfizer, et. al. Because the legal indemnity is ONLY for a vaccine. If it is not a vaccine, there is no indemnity!
In its final ruling, the court decided [that] “At this stage, we must accept Plaintiffs’ allegations that the vaccine does not prevent the spread of COVID-19 as true… And, because of this, Jacobson does not apply. LAUSD cannot get around this standard by stating that Plaintiffs’ allegations are wrong. Nor can LAUSD do so by providing facts that do not contradict Plaintiffs’ allegations… But even if the materials offered by LAUSD are subject to judicial notice, they do not support rejecting Plaintiffs’ allegations. LAUSD only provides a CDC [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] publication that says “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.” But “safe and effective” for what? LAUSD implies that it is for preventing transmission of COVID-19 but does not adduce judicially noticeable facts that prove this.” [emphasis added]