important finding! Or a very muddled one, at least. Maybe deliberately so…
This:
That’s all? It means that of 100 people who had seasonal flu, 16 died in the next year and a half. (With respect to fatalities, we are talking almost exclusively about an elderly and severely ailing population; not reported is how many died in the next year and a half absent either disease.) Whereas, of 100 who had covid, 24 out of 100 died in the ensuing 18 months.
OK, eight more deaths per 100 after 18 months. And not necessarily related to either the flu or to COVID–they didn’t control for that. And not factored in at all is the exposure to the “vaccine” itself! As a scientific methodologist, I would have been utterly embarrassed to have created such a weak and lame study!
But fine, that result makes some sense (though even so, the effect size is extremely modest–miniscule, even. But then, what do I make of THIS?
Regarding both viruses, patient vaccination status did not affect results.
Huh??? Honestly, I don’t know how to interpret that statement given some of the other results in that study that were reported. Do you?