Categories
Anti-scientific stance Deception

Oh, you

don’t say!

It’s a HUGE scam! You’re being snookered, folks…

Facts don’t care about your fear-mongering. In an outcome completely foreseeable after 50+ years of failed climate predictions, it seems that a whopping 36 climate models overestimated warming in America’s Corn Belt — by a lot.

What the “Global Warming” freaks have predicted is WILDLY different from what is actually observed.

Folks, it’s a scam!

At what point do we admit reality?

(sorry for the repeats—blogging with an iPad REALLY stinks, and it won’t let me delete them without trashing the whole thing and starting over… It REALLY is onerous!)

Categories
Anti-scientific stance Buffoons

I don’t get it.

Honestly, why?

And how could a bike rider even breathe?

Categories
Anti-scientific stance Fools

She is

a freakin’ MORON! She is completely irrational. Willfully ignorant–willfully not at all in touch with reality.

A lot of these “climate nuts” are just out of control ignorant! They are SO easily led by other climate nuts, and there is this famously smug, narcissistic streak in them.

Categories
Anti-scientific stance Evil Clown

The data

are IN. To now be a supporter of lockdowns is to be a despotic, anti-science FREAK! Get out of the 12th century for Pete’s sake!

Scientists from Johns Hopkins University and Lund University examined almost 20,000 studies on measures taken to protect populations against Covid across the world.
***
The report authors said their findings showed that the draconian measures had a “negligible impact” on Covid mortality and were a “policy failure of gigantic proportions”.
***
The study’s authors conclude: “The science of lockdowns is clear; the data are in: the deaths saved were a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs imposed.”

Don’t be a benighted fool!

The detrimental impact of lockdown on children’s health and education, on economic growth and its contribution to large increases in public debt has become increasingly clear since the policy was introduced.

Categories
Anti-scientific stance Pandemic Panic Porn Pimps

Did you

know

Lockdown saved as few as 1,700 lives in England and Wales in spring 2020, according to a landmark study which concludes the benefits of the policy were “a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs” imposed.

… The report authors said their findings showed that the draconian measures had a “negligible impact” on Covid mortality and were a “policy failure of gigantic proportions”.

… The study’s authors conclude: “The science of lockdowns is clear; the data are in: the deaths saved were a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs imposed.”

Categories
Anti-scientific stance

Gee, what a

surprise!

The climate change wackos are incredibly unscientific. They are intellectually mired in a kind of superstitious dark ages.

As usual, climate alarmists need to chill out. Junk Science’s Steve Milloy slammed recent scare-mongering that man-made climate change is supposedly causing increasing extreme weather events. “There is no correlation between emissions and any type of extreme weather event,” Milloy said in exclusive comments to PJ Media.

… As Milloy told me, “Activists like to dramatize their concern for the environment.” The current narrative on extreme weather and climate change isn’t about science, it’s about woke virtue-signaling. [emphasis added]

I agree, this is just one river of holier-than-thou flowing into an ocean of smirking narcissism…

Categories
Anti-scientific stance

Masking

harms people. The data are really quite clear.

Please, hew to the data, not to some cockamamie Lefty shibboleth!

Categories
Anti-scientific stance

RFK Jr, is totally

up in the night, here. Barking mad.

Are most shooters on SSRIS? Yes, of course. BUT, that is because 100% of shooters are disturbed! So they at some point get taken to treatment, and of course are put on SSRIs, as is virtually universal practice.

But these shooters do not become disturbed because of the SSRI. They were put on SSRIs because they were disturbed!

But 99.99999% of those on SSRIs do NOT become school shooters. JFK Jr. is a moron. If he had a smidgeon of actual scientific knowledge, he wouldn’t say such an obviously stupid thing.

Categories
Anti-scientific stance Bad Faith

Oh! So

one dose is enough, now. Did the SCIENCE change, or just the politics? Methinks it’s the latter…

The FDA and CDC recently announced that previously unvaccinated Americans can now receive only a single dose of the bivalent Moderna or Pfizer mRNA vaccines. To be clear, this is not saying they can choose to have one or two doses and be considered fully vaccinated either way — only one dose is available to them. 

… In practice, these policy changes will probably not affect many people. The approximately 30% of Americans who have refused all COVID-19 vaccines for over 2 years — often for political reasons and because of widespread misinformation [ed. REALLY?] — are unlikely to change their attitudes merely because they are now limited to receiving only a single bivalent vaccine dose... Even so, it’s worth exploring what lies behind what just happened.

It is a face-saving fallback position. DUH! The science doesn’t support ONE injection, let alone two or more. It never did. The author of this article is pathetically unscientific and rigidly biased, but still has to report that only one injection is now required (or even available). Must be hard for him. Baby steps…

Categories
Anti-scientific stance Civil Rights

Yes, by all means,

call out the liars.

The scientific data are clear as a bell. But the gun controller nuts are FAR from scientific! You can’t sit down and make “reasonable” gun laws with these kooks because they are not reasonable!

I just get tired of these unscientific, pre-modern goons who stupidly bleat that we need to go back to the Samurai era where the young and strong enslaved the weak. No thanks—I am a modern man…

Gun-control costs lives and endangers our children in their schools. Before you can believe that you need to know that armed defense by ordinary citizens is common. Americans use a firearm to stop threats of death or bodily harm about 2.8 million times a year. That’s over 7600 times a day.

…We started to train and arm volunteer school staff a decade ago after the mass-murder at Sandy Hook in Connecticut. We have now accumulated several thousand man-years of experience with these armed volunteers. You might have missed that their efforts have worked in the best possible way. The presence of armed teachers and others has prevented attacks at their school. Let me underline that for you.

We have never had a mass-murder at a school that had a program of trained and armed school staff.

If you are going to swim in these gun waters, you need to know your crap! <sheesh!>

I’m giving you facts, but facts don’t matter to gun-control ideologues. For them, the ideal of gun-control is an end in itself rather than an instrumental means to save lives. Mass murders are simply an excuse to disarm more honest citizens.